亳州奈嘿装饰设计工程有限公司|无码欧美精品一区二区蜜桃色欲-精品无码一区二区-久久亚洲视频

Home About us News center Products Innovation Careers
industry news
company news
industry news
media focus
video
Tax vs. fee at issue in Denver bag-ban proposal
 
 

By Jeremy Carroll
STAFF REPORTER
Published: August 23, 2013 2:40 pm ET


While officials in Denver are expected to debate the merits of a plastic and paper bag fee in early September, opponents of the measure say the fee isn’t a fee at all.
Instead they say it’s a tax.
While sometimes the discussion around bag fees or taxes is one of semantics, the distinction is actually a very important one in Colorado, where a state constitutional amendment forces an election on any potential tax increase. But if the measure is labeled a fee, no vote is needed.
“The state and local governments have taken that fee loophole and just run amok with it,” said Jim Manley, staff attorney with the Mountain States Legal Foundation. “Instead of structuring fees for service, they just label stuff a fee and figure that’s good enough to avoid the voter approval requirements of [the Taxpayers Bill of Rights].”
The Mountain States Legal Foundation is currently suing Aspen, Colo., for a bag fee the city passed in 2011. That ordinance bans plastic bags, but puts a 20-cent fee on all paper bags distributed at grocery stores in the city.
“Whatever the judge decides in the Aspen case is going to be directly relevant to Denver,” Manley said. “If we’re successful in Aspen, then Denver is going to have to step back and take another look at what they’re planning on doing.”
Denver’s city attorney did not return a phone call seeking comment on the issue, but officials did meet in closed session to discuss the legality of the measure.
Council member Debbie Ortega has pushed the measure forward, introducing it in July. According to city documents, there are an estimated 130 million single-use shopping bags used at Denver’s large grocery and convenience stores annually. Those bags turn into 4.3 tons of waste.
The 5-cent fee will be split between the city and the store handing out and charging for the bag, according to the proposal. The city would take 3 cents of the charge and the remaining 2 cents would be given to the stores to help pay for the record-keeping and maintenance of the program.
The city estimates it will earn $1.6 million in revenue from the measure, which it will use for education and reusable bags to be given to lower-income residents.
Ultimately, whether the measure is labeled a tax or a fee does not actually matter, said Phil Rozenski, policy chair for the American Progressive Bag Alliance. Rozenski also is director of sustainability and marketing for Hilex Poly Co. LLC of Harts¬ville, S.C.
“Whether it’s a tax or a fee, the impact is exactly the same,” he said. “It’s a regressive fee or tax on families. The lower the family income, the greater the impact. It will still take the same amount of money out of a family’s pocket whether it’s a tax or a fee.”
Denver’s proposal passed the city’s Health, Safety, Education and Services Committee on Aug. 20 and is expected before the full City Council in early September.
Meanwhile in California, two communities took on the issue of bag bans. Lawmakers in Los Gatos, located just south of San Jose, voted to ban plastic bags while lawmakers in El Cerrito, near Oakland, took a step toward banning plastic bags and polystyrene foam containers.
Los Gatos City Council voted 4-1 to pass a ban on plastic bags and a fee of 10 cents on paper bags to begin in early 2014.
The bans in El Cerrito passed unanimously on first reading, and a final vote will take place Sept. 17, El Cerrito clerk Cheryl Morse told Plastics News.
The debate over plastics bags goes back to 2011 in El Cerrito, with officials approving a plan for a more regional approach to the issue. The City Council took the issue up again after the West Contra Costa Integrated Waste Management Authority adopted a model ordinance for communities to pass and concluded an environmental impact report.
The ban extends to all retail establishments except restaurants and nonprofit resale shops. The ordinance would also charge customers 5 cents for paper bags until 2016, when that fee rises to 10 cents per paper bag.
The polystyrene ban would restrict food establishments from giving customers takeout food in disposable PS. It would then force those establishments to use compostable, recyclable or reusable food containers. The ban would become effective Jan. 1 and enforceable July 1.
With the California state bill banning plastic bags stalling earlier this year, officials with the Californians Against Waste are encouraging more local ordinances.

 
About us
company profile
company culture
version and strategy
company history
certification
patents
contact
News center
company news
industry news
media focus
video
Products
products catalog
technical support
Innovation
create value
production line
QA&QC
new technique info
Copyright:King-Tech China Co.,Ltd
色噜噜狠狠爱综合视频| 狠狠色噜噜狠狠狠狠aV不卡| 一本之道无码一区二区| 成人乱码免费视频A片含羞草传媒| 国产无套护士在线观看| 无遮挡呻吟娇喘视频免费播放| 欧美激情综合色综合啪啪五月| 永久免费av无码网站韩国毛片| 无码国内精品人妻少妇蜜桃视频| 午夜影院0606免费| 国产成人精品一区二区三区无码| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 日韩av人人夜夜澡人人爽| 人人妻人人澡人人爽欧美一区| 俺来也俺去啦久久综合网| 日本japanese超丰满| 狠狠精品干练久久久无码中文字幕| 国产精品毛片无遮挡高清| 国产美女mm131爽爽爽爽| 国产在线精品无码二区二区| 国产乱对白刺激视频| 加勒比无码一区二区三区| 国产在线视欧美亚综合| 日本AAAA级毛卡片免费观看| 内地老太婆内射内地小矮人内射| 双性少爷挨脔日常H惩罚H| 特黄特色高清不卡免费视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区| 亚洲AV无码成人网站久久精品大| 成人亚洲欧美中文日韩| heyzo中文字幕无码| 中国老熟妇506070| 69精品人人人人| а∨天堂在线中文免费不卡| 欧美激情无码成人A片| 欧美巨大xxxxbbb| 十四以下岁毛片带血a级| 国产又爽又黄又无遮挡的激情视频| 无码人妻丰满熟妇区BBBBXXXX| 天码欧美日本一道免费| 8848高清电影电视剧免费看|